Researchers have visualised, for the first time, why perovskites – materials which could replace silicon in next-generation solar cells – are seemingly so tolerant of defects in their structure.
A team from the University of Cambridge used Diamond’s Hard X-Ray Nanoprobe beamline (I14) to carry out microscopy measurements on this promising material, with a view to maximising its efficiency. The findings were published in the journal Nature Nanotechnology.
The most commonly used material for producing solar panels is crystalline silicon but achieving efficient energy conversion requires an energy-intensive and time-consuming production process to create a highly ordered wafer structure.
In the last decade, perovskite materials have emerged as promising alternatives to silicon. The lead salts used to make perovskites are much more abundant and cheaper to produce than crystalline silicon, and they can be prepared in liquid ink that is simply printed to produce a film of the material. They also show great potential for other applications, such as energy-efficient light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and X-ray detectors.
The performance of perovskites is surprising. The typical model for an excellent semiconductor is a highly ordered structure, but the array of different chemical elements in perovskites creates a much ‘messier’ landscape. This messiness causes defects in the material that lead to tiny ‘traps’, which typically reduce performance. But despite the presence of these defects, perovskite materials still show efficiency levels comparable to their silicon alternatives.
In fact, earlier research by the same team behind the current work showed the disordered structure can actually increase the performance of perovskite optoelectronics, and their latest work seeks to explain why.
Combining a series of new microscopy techniques, the group present a complete picture of the nanoscale chemical, structural and optoelectronic landscape of these materials, that reveals the complex interactions between these competing factors and ultimately, shows which comes out on top.
First author, Kyle Frohna, from Cambridge’s Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology (CEB)t in, said:
What we see is that we have two forms of disorder happening in parallel. The electronic disorder associated with the defects that reduce performance, and then the spatial chemical disorder that seems to improve it. And what we’ve found is that the chemical disorder – the ‘good’ disorder in this case – mitigates the ‘bad’ disorder from the defects by funnelling the charge carriers away from these traps that they might otherwise get caught in.
Julia Parker, Diamond Hard X-ray Nanoprobe Beamline Scientist, said:
The 50nm X-ray beam on the nanoprobe allowed us to image this spatial chemical disorder in fine detail which could then be correlated with other measurements to understand the link between the different factors affecting optical performance.
In collaboration with researchers from the Cavendish Laboratory, Diamond, and the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology in Japan, the researchers used several different microscopic techniques to look at the same regions in the perovskite film. They could then compare the results from all these methods to present the full picture of what’s happening at a nanoscale level in these materials.
The findings will allow researchers to further refine how perovskite solar cells are made in order to maximise efficiency.
Paul Quinn, Diamond Imaging Group Leader, said:
This work is the result of a long-standing collaboration with the Stranks group to bring the latest X-ray techniques to bear on solar cell materials to help understand and improve their performance.
Co-author Miguel Anaya, also from CEB, said:
We have visualised and given reasons why we can call these materials defect tolerant. This methodology enables new routes to optimise them at the nanoscale to perform better for a targeted application. Now, we can look at other types of perovskites that are not only good for solar cells but also for LEDs or detectors and understand their working principles.
Dr Sam Stranks from CEB, who led the research, added:
Through these visualisations, we now much better understand the nanoscale landscape in these fascinating semiconductors – the good, the bad and the ugly. These results explain how the empirical optimisation of these materials by the field has driven these mixed composition perovskites to such high performances. But it has also revealed blueprints for design of new semiconductors that may have similar attributes – where disorder can be exploited to tailor performance.
